Dailydave mailing list archives

Dreaming of Summer


From: surreal () delusory org
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 23:57:53 -0700

For your consideration: Thoughts on a Virtual Multi-Bird Projectile

Dave's list may not be the right forum for this idea, but I like to think that the right people might see this (and 
it's only one message, so here goes). I'd like to address two problems and promote Good Clean Fun at the same time.

Problem one: Redhat; RHN; EOL. 

A large but unknown (to me) number of Redhat boxes running 7.3 through 9 are about to be left to their own devices for 
bugfixes and security updates. Redhat hasn't seemed very excited about helping these soon-to-be-stranded sysadmins. 
"Buy our pricey distro and reinstall all your boxes" or "run Fedora and dwell forever in Beta Hell" just don't make me 
feel, uh, loved and valued. I *liked* up2date.

Problem two: CTF got boring.

To quote Dave, from 8/5/2003:
...
Also, I admit it WAS a sysadmin game, but CTF should not be. If we're
going to make it Defend The Flag, then just have another game. You need to
make it a game where offense matters. Otherwise you just have everyone
hunkered around doing defense, like this and every other year. Did the
winning team write any exploits? I don't think they did. What does that
say?

My proposal is this: CTF - Dead Hat Edition 2004

Is it just me, or is that catchy? That is, of course, assuming a DC XII. :-|

By July, 7.3 and 8 will have been orphaned for 6 months, Redhat 9 for at least 3. How fast does a Linux distro go 
stale? Is someone holding off on the next big remote r00t until next year? How many ways will there be to r00t that 
"unknown number of boxes"? Who is this man of toast, and what is his dark secret?

I propose that the nodes for CTF be Redhat boxes patched up to their EOL date like any happy RHN-using box. I'm a 
defender, not a sploit coder so I leave the difficult details of play and scoring to the Smart Folks.

I'd like to think that just maybe an event like CTF-DH could prod Redhat to do a little more for the people they're 
leaving behind. Maybe host a "community supported" alternative to RHN? Anything's better than what we've got right now.

Maybe they'd ignore the whole thing... If the results of the competition were documented, at least people would know 
where some of the holes are(?)

Yeah, it *could* backfire and turn into a primer for a Redhat holocaust. The way things are going though, 2004 could be 
the year Linux gets the reputation for being r00ted as readily as Windows. That'd suck, IMO.

Warm regards,
Surreal, OPSA. "A single-acronym kinda guy"

P.S. From the Hope Springs Eternal department:
If you like this idea, I'd love to have a copy of CANVAS to work with. I know it got "released", but Homey don't do 
W4r3Z, and I's just a po' .edu feller.
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave


Current thread: