Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd () suespammers org>
Date: 27 Aug 2002 03:20:16 -0400
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 03:12, itojun () iijlab net wrote:
the problem is that some protocol proposal do not consider IPv4 mapped address as "bogon" - they propose to actually use them in IPv6 traffic on wire.
They used to be bogons, so any currently existing bogon filters (e.g., in firewalls) will drop them. Only remove them from your bogon filters when/if you decide you want them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- IPv4 mapped address considered harmful Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Aug 22)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful Anthony DeRobertis (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful itojun (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful Anthony DeRobertis (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful itojun (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful Anthony DeRobertis (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful itojun (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful Anthony DeRobertis (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful itojun (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful Anthony DeRobertis (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful itojun (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful Mark Tinberg (Aug 27)