Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS?
From: blymn () baesystems com au (Brett Lymn)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:23:03 +0930 (CST)
According to Darren Reed:
stupid window size of one byte may generate a very high overhead.Silly window sizes aren't so bad.
Oh no, they can be very bad and can choke performance measurably. They are very subtle too because you will not see them if you are "close" to the server. Once your RTT increases then you are more likely to see this problem, especially if you have a fat pipe (eg cable, adsl) because you can quickly fill the window and then have to wait for the acks to trickle back. -- =============================================================================== Brett Lymn, Computer Systems Administrator, BAE SYSTEMS ===============================================================================
Current thread:
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS?, (continued)
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? David LeBlanc (Jul 09)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Pavel Machek (Jul 15)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Crist Clark (Jul 19)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Eric Vyncke (Jul 09)
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Russ (Jul 09)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Darren Reed (Jul 10)
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? David LeBlanc (Jul 10)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Darren Reed (Jul 10)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? gregory duchemin (Jul 09)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Darren Reed (Jul 09)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? John Kristoff (Jul 10)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Brett Lymn (Jul 10)
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Franck Martin (Jul 10)
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Crist Clark (Jul 18)