Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: [Fwd: NOTE: Solaris 7 gotcha for some ultras]
From: twells () SHORE NET (Tabor J. Wells)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 10:40:09 -0500
On Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 07:59:54PM +0000, Alan Cox <alan () LXORGUK UKUU ORG UK> is thought to have said:
advice was that if you were at all worried about this, you should run the 32- bit kernel for peace of mind. Later processors are unaffected. If they'd put the 64-bit kernel in by default, you'd criticise them for leaving a security hole in the system.....If they worked around it I'd be more impressed, if they shipped replacement CPU's I'd be even more impressed still. The ultrasparc was advertised as a 64bit CPU, people did buy them on that basis. Does anyone who has an actual maintenance contract (ie more than 1 leg to stand on in this issue) know if they are replacing faulty CPU's ?
By my reading of http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/articles/article4.html it says: Flash Prom Update Multimedia Answer Book CD To enable 64-bit operation, certain UltraSPARC platforms may need a firmware or Flash PROM upgrade, as indicated in this chart: Platform Minimum Firmware (Flash PROM) Upgrade Required SunW, Ultra (tm)-1 3.11.1 or higher Sun W, Ultra-2 3.11.2 SunW, Ultra-450 3.11.107 SunW, Ultra-Enterprise (tm) 3.2.15 The Solaris CD includes information on how to implement the Flash prom upgrade. For detailed step-by-step update instructions, go to the Flash PROM Update Multimedia Answer Book CD. If you require personal assistance with the Flash PROM update, please contact Sun support. For more information on the Flash PROM upgrade, refer to the Solaris 7 Sun Hardware Platform Guide (PN# 805-4456-10) located in the Solaris 7 media kit. I'm not sure if the firmware patches are available via the public FTP site, though. Tabor Shore.Net -- ________________________________________________________________________ Tabor J. Wells twells () shore net Shore.Net Systems Admin. Just another victim of the ambient morality
Current thread:
- Re: [Fwd: NOTE: Solaris 7 gotcha for some ultras] Paul Murphy (Nov 11)
- Re: [Fwd: NOTE: Solaris 7 gotcha for some ultras] Alan Cox (Nov 11)
- Re: [Fwd: NOTE: Solaris 7 gotcha for some ultras] Solar Designer (Nov 13)
- Re: [Fwd: NOTE: Solaris 7 gotcha for some ultras] Tabor J. Wells (Nov 13)
- Re: [Fwd: NOTE: Solaris 7 gotcha for some ultras] Casper Dik (Nov 14)
- Re: [Fwd: NOTE: Solaris 7 gotcha for some ultras] Alan Cox (Nov 11)