Bugtraq mailing list archives
netscape remote control - so what?
From: jb.sg () fp cibc com (Justin Beech)
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 12:35:15 +0800
I think this discussion is pretty silly it seems just a forum for people to vent some kind of weird angst over netscape. (the last post mentioning "netscrape" demonstrates this clearly). If anyone is silly enough to run a server xhost + to untrusted machines then they deserve all the security problems they get, and shouldnt bore people on this list with horror stories of what this allows someone to do with one particular software package. Why not take shots at all the other packages vulnerable to xhost +? Remote control using operating system or desktop APIs is a very useful for lots and lots of reasons and any security issues with this are to be placed at the feet of the OS or desktop design, not a software vendor -- and I dont see this thread raising any new security issues there, so can we drop it please? -Justin.
Current thread:
- denial of service - inetd on solaris 2.4? Justin Beech (May 23)
- Re: denial of service - inetd on solaris 2.4? Casper Dik (May 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: denial of service - inetd on solaris 2.4? Brad Powell (May 24)
- Re: denial of service - inetd on solaris 2.4? Jack Flory (May 24)
- Re: denial of service - inetd on solaris 2.4? Brett Lymn (May 26)
- netscape remote control - so what? Justin Beech (May 26)
- Re: netscape remote control - so what? martinh () mailhost emap co uk (May 28)
- Re: denial of service - inetd on solaris 2.4? Peter Skopp (May 27)