Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Intelligent modems :-(
From: jbb () cs umb edu (John B. Brown)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 09:36:53 -0500
Dear Folks, Why has such easy back-door access been installed at all? Shalom, JBB.
From owner-bugtraq () fc net Mon Mar 13 10:44:13 1995 To: Phil Male <phil () compnews co uk> Cc: bugtraq () fc net Subject: Re: Intelligent modems :-( From: Christian Wettergren <cwe () it kth se>
| > > If it is in LAP-M mode, just send of AT*R to them (protected | > > with a preset password of QWERTY). You may also use the command | > > <1s>****<1s> analog to the +++ sequence. You may even load | > | > I'm sure there must be a way to disable it or change the password? | | There is - I had this conversation over a year ago here and if I had the | manuals to hand I'd tell you want it is (well on the modems we use | anyway) - but it is documentated in the manuals.
There is, I believe it was AT*C or something. What concerns me is that this is totally undocumented in the papers from Intel.
I also feel uneasy with the possibility of reprogramming the Flash-PROMs. Many of the modems do have quite a lot of RAM inside, one model I saw said it had 32kRAM inside (not a Rockwell chip though). It might be farfetched, but I would definitely not want someone to upload a "password sniffer" into my modem.
/Christian Wettergren, cwe () it kth se KTH/Teleinformatics
Current thread:
- Intelligent modems :-( Christian Wettergren (Mar 11)
- Re: Intelligent modems :-( John W. Temples (Mar 11)
- Re: Intelligent modems :-( Phil Male (Mar 12)
- Re: Intelligent modems :-( Christian Wettergren (Mar 13)
- Re: Intelligent modems :-( Phil Male (Mar 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Intelligent modems :-( John B. Brown (Mar 13)
- Re: Intelligent modems :-( John W. Temples (Mar 11)