Bugtraq mailing list archives
*PLEASE* shut up
From: de5 () de5 CTD ORNL GOV (Dave Sill)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 1994 22:19:55 -0400
I don't want to be rude, folks, but the noise level on this list has gone through the roof. We don't need endless debate about full disclosure. If you don't have new, technical information about a security bug, don't post to the list--mail directly to the participants or take it to comp.security.unix. -Dave
Current thread:
- Re: Is starting a user program on priv port via inetd dangerous ?, (continued)
- Re: Is starting a user program on priv port via inetd dangerous ? matthew green (Jul 21)
- Re: Is starting a user program on priv port via inetd dangerous ? Darren Reed (Jul 22)
- Re: Is starting a user program on priv port via inetd dangerous ? jmc () gnu ai mit edu (Jul 22)
- yes, there's another hole in BIND Paul A Vixie (Jul 21)
- Re: yes, there's another hole in BIND Resident Hacker (Jul 22)
- Re: yes, there's another hole in BIND Paul A Vixie (Jul 22)
- Re: yes, there's another hole in BIND Perry E. Metzger (Jul 22)
- Re: yes, there's another hole in BIND Pat Myrto (Jul 22)
- Re: yes, there's another hole in BIND David Barr (Jul 22)
- Re: yes, there's another hole in BIND Joe Hentzel (Jul 22)
- *PLEASE* shut up Dave Sill (Jul 22)
- Re: Is starting a user program on priv port via inetd dangerous ? Graham Toal (Jul 22)
- Re: Sending escape sequences to xterms via wall/talk jmc () gnu ai mit edu (Jul 20)
- root name server corruption, denial of service prob Mark (Jul 21)
- Re: root name server corruption, denial of service prob Mark Kosters (Jul 21)
- Re: Escape sequences (was Wall and talkd pass binary data) Bruce Barnett (Jul 20)
- Re: Wall and talkd pass binary data G.J.W. Hagenaars (Jul 20)