Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely?
From: no () dot no
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:03:42 -0600
Patrick, good response. But I wonder about this.. "The OP's suggested risk vector - malware infested proxy sites isn't even the worst one introduced. I've seen places where blocking has induced users to use bypass mechanisms including: - Separate dialup connections - USB Wifi piggy-backing on nearby offices' signals - SSH tunneling - VPN connections out to a machine acting as a proxy (home PC for example) - GoToMyPC or equivalent to a machine acting as a proxy" If you have a user that will violate corporate policy by circumventing systems put in place, that is an HR issue. The examples you site, we block. We're incredibly concerned about data leakage being in the financial industry. Maybe those systems aren't needed in all forms of business. I'm of the belief that we all choose where we work, and we all play by the rules laid out by mgmt. We can choose to play along, or not. Those measures aren't put in place to make people's work environment less fun. They're done for the well being of the company. It only takes one person to leak out sensitive data, emails, etc and create a potentially bad situation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: InfoSec Institute Need to pass the CISSP? InfoSec Institute's CISSP Boot Camp in both Instructor-Led and Online formats is the most concentrated exam prep available. Comprehensive course materials and an expert instructor means you pass the exam. Gain a laser like insight into what is covered on the exam, with zero fluff! http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/cissp_bootcamp_training.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Allowing access to social networking... securely?, (continued)
- RE: Allowing access to social networking... securely? Ian Bradshaw (May 20)
- Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? krymson (May 20)
- Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? krymson (May 20)
- RE: Allowing access to social networking... securely? Robin Smith (FaceTime) (May 21)
- Re: Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? chmod1777 (May 21)
- Re: Re: Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? lmaia (May 21)
- RE: Re: Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? Ian Bradshaw (May 22)
- Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? krymson (May 22)
- Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? krymson (May 22)
- Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? Patrick J Kobly (May 22)
- Re: Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? no (May 22)
- Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? Patrick J Kobly (May 25)
- Re: Re: Allowing access to social networking... securely? Stephen Mullins (May 26)