Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Security vs. Simplicity
From: Stephen Mullins <steve.mullins.work () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:18:33 -0400
I agree that the goals of network ops and network security seemingly contradict one another. Network Operations calls for simplicity, redundancy, and ease of troubleshooting. Network Security calls for defense in depth and secure design over all else. But you want a "managerial perspective."
From a "managerial perspective", none of this matters. What matters
is pleasing the customer. The customer may be a business you are contracted to service, or the internal business. From that perspective what matters is being compliant with all applicable laws and maintaining high availability of systems/networks so your organization can continue making money and you get to keep your job. If security impedes the company's ability to make money then you have failed. This is why, in the private sector, networks will only ever be as secure as they are required to be by law to pass the annual audits they must do. Prior to the passing of various legislation requiring implementation of sound security practices, few bothered "wasting" money on even hiring a single security admin, let alone going the extra mile. So that's my "bottom line" perspective. Security must be mandated by legislation or it will not exist at a high level as it does not generate profits and a business's primary goal is to turn a profit. Obviously some businesses (banks, e-commerce) have a strong interest in maintaining secure systems. Private hospitals, schools, and various businesses really don't - unless you force them to implement security and go through annual audits. All that talk about damage to a brand or loss of customer good will is bunk. So many organizations have had data stolen from them at this point that the consumer doesn't trust any of them and is not shocked by any breach whatsoever. It's barely even news these days "another company lost customer data to hackers, ho hum, next page." Steve Mullins On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:32 AM, avi shvartz <yram () netvision net il> wrote:
Hello list, In a design process of a critical infrastructure system there is always a tension between two tenets: The "simplicity tenet" - keep it simple as much as possible. And The "security tenet" - make it secure as much as possible. I am perfectly aware of all risk evaluation and assessment, TCO calculations etc, that suppose to help us all to reach a decision about "how much security" and "how much simplicity". But, we all know that gathering all relevant information and getting overall agreement about them and about the calculations of the risk\tco calculations is not "optimal" to say the least. I am also aware to the statement : "simple design is also a secured design". But, we all know that in real life the security folks wants to add "just this extra layer (for security in depth) And\or "just this vlan (for yet another communication separation)" etc. Don't get me wrong, I do understand that it's a valid concern, I just say that it's not always will be in line with the "simple" design tenet. Now, let's say that after all the technical discussions the two inflamed opponents are in front of us (kind of real life situation.). I would like to ask your opinion in the following way: Let say that you are the manager who have to say one statement (kind of a bottom line): "Design that system according to the simplicity principal" or "Design that system according to the security principal" I would humbly ask for an answer in a "managerial style": first : what will be that bottom line. second: (kind of appendix.) any explanation that you wish to add. Than you all for your kind attention, Avi ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: InfoSec Institute Need to pass the CISSP? InfoSec Institute's CISSP Boot Camp in both Instructor-Led and Online formats is the most concentrated exam prep available. Comprehensive course materials and an expert instructor means you pass the exam. Gain a laser like insight into what is covered on the exam, with zero fluff! http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/cissp_bootcamp_training.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: InfoSec Institute Need to pass the CISSP? InfoSec Institute's CISSP Boot Camp in both Instructor-Led and Online formats is the most concentrated exam prep available. Comprehensive course materials and an expert instructor means you pass the exam. Gain a laser like insight into what is covered on the exam, with zero fluff! http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/cissp_bootcamp_training.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Security vs. Simplicity avi shvartz (May 19)
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity Robin Wood (May 19)
- RE: Security vs. Simplicity Craig S. Wright (May 22)
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity Stephen Mullins (May 19)
- RE: Security vs. Simplicity David Gillett (May 19)
- RE: Security vs. Simplicity avi shvartz (May 19)
- RE: Security vs. Simplicity David Gillett (May 20)
- RE: Security vs. Simplicity David Gillett (May 19)
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity Robin Wood (May 19)
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity Ansgar Wiechers (May 19)
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity Aarón Mizrachi (May 20)
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity Paul Halliday (May 20)
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity Meenal Mukadam (May 21)
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity Daniel Miessler (May 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Security vs. Simplicity aaa (May 19)
- RE: Security vs. Simplicity Craig S. Wright (May 22)