Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: what should I do when....


From: Adriel Desautels <adriel () netragard com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:43:19 -0400

Great,
        You must be using the right one then.

Regards,
        Adriel T. Desautels
        Chief Technology Officer
        Netragard, LLC.
        Office : 617-934-0269
        Mobile : 617-633-3821
        http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/118/a45

        Join the Netragard, LLC. Linked In Group:
        http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/48683/0B98E1705142

---------------------------------------------------------------
Netragard, LLC - http://www.netragard.com  -  "We make IT Safe"
Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Assessments, Website Security

Netragard Whitepaper Downloads:
-------------------------------
Choosing the right provider : http://tinyurl.com/2ahk3j
Three Things you must know  : http://tinyurl.com/26pjsn


William Mohney wrote:
I can't argue with "simple, clean, and well managed".  But the Firewall
is one of the simple tools I use.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Adriel Desautels [mailto:adriel () netragard com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 2:35 PM
To: William Mohney
Cc: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: what should I do when....

What about not using all the tools and only using the ones you need in a

simple, clean, and well managed configuration?   ;]

Regards,
        Adriel T. Desautels
        Chief Technology Officer
        Netragard, LLC.
        Office : 617-934-0269
        Mobile : 617-633-3821
        http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/118/a45

        Join the Netragard, LLC. Linked In Group:
        http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/48683/0B98E1705142

---------------------------------------------------------------
Netragard, LLC - http://www.netragard.com  -  "We make IT Safe"
Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Assessments, Website Security

Netragard Whitepaper Downloads:
-------------------------------
Choosing the right provider : http://tinyurl.com/2ahk3j Three Things you
must know  : http://tinyurl.com/26pjsn


William Mohney wrote:
No one tool protects "enough".  That's why we use all the tools.

Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com]
On Behalf Of Adriel Desautels
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 9:14 AM
To: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: what should I do when....

Ansgar,
        You are right, I am wrong. A firewall is not a traffic shaping
device
and I was using the wrong terminology (which doesn't happen very often, but its somewhat refreshing when it does and I'm corrected).

        I do stand by my *opinion* that a firewall is not a security
device
but is a traffic control device. My opinion can be contradicted as the

definition of security is to protect from harm, and firewalls do protect

some systems from harm. That is not enough to make me change my mind though. Firewalls do not protect *enough* and are easy enough to circumvent.

Regards,
        Adriel T. Desautels
        Chief Technology Officer
        Netragard, LLC.
        Office : 617-934-0269
        Mobile : 617-633-3821
        http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/118/a45

        Join the Netragard, LLC. Linked In Group:
        http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/48683/0B98E1705142

---------------------------------------------------------------
Netragard, LLC - http://www.netragard.com  -  "We make IT Safe"
Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Assessments, Website Security

Netragard Whitepaper Downloads:
-------------------------------
Choosing the right provider : http://tinyurl.com/2ahk3j Three Things you must know : http://tinyurl.com/26pjsn


Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:
On 2008-07-10 Adriel Desautels wrote:
What I said is not wrong, it is actually very accurate.
No.

Firewalls are traffic shaping devices and it is my opinion that they

are not security devices. In fact, I'm not sure what you disagree with.
Look up the definition of "traffic shaping" (e.g. [1]). Look up the definition of "firewall" (e.g. [2]). Notice the difference.

I said:

"It is my opinion that firewalls are not security devices as much as

they are traffic shaping devices. Their job is to control network connections and the flow of traffic, not to ensure that something can't be hacked."

You accused me of being wrong, but then you said:

"A firewall is the implementation of a concept of what kind of
traffic
you want to allow or disallow between any two given networks."

Isn't that what I said?
No.

You are in fact shaping traffic by controlling what goes in and out.
I
suppose my use of the term "Traffic Shaping" could be argued.
No.

Firewalls accept or deny access based on their ruleset. Traffic
shaping
devices don't decide whether to accept or deny anything, but modify packet rates in order to optimize network performance and/or bandwidth usage. Two entirely different concepts, using different means to
achieve
different ends.

I do think that firewalls can be used to enforce certain policies
that
are security oriented, but firewalls are not in my opinion security devices.
Then your opinion is wrong. Plain and simple.

The decision what you want to allow or disallow into or out of your network is by any means a security decision. Firewalls implement and enforce this decision on a technical level and therefore are by definition security devices.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_shaping
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firewall

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers

Current thread: