Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises
From: itsec.info () gmail com
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:32:55 +0200
Thanks for all these comments! Actually the background of my question is that I have been asked which attacks are possible from a Home PC which is connected via cablemodem to the Internet. Originally I thought only BGP attacks are a threat but then I was asked how about the following attacks: a) DNS Spoofing: man in the middle b) ICMP router discovery protocol, e.g. re-routing a route c) ARP cache and spoofing d) IRPAS and VIPPR attacks from phenolit e) OSPF and HSPF attacks etc I thought only the a) and b) are possible but now I am confused again.
From a cablemodem you see only autonomous systems and the respective
routers. Properly configured routers - AS to AS - support only BGP4, don't they? Can you please help me to understand what protocols which kind of routers support? Thanks very much. Mike On 9/27/07, Anthony <ez4me2c3d () gmail com> wrote:
I second this guy's comment. gjgowey () tmo blackberry net wrote:With companies one of the first questions that I think some people forget to ask is if a routing protocol is really necessary for the network topology that they have. Routing protocols are only really useful for when you have multiple paths out of your particular subnet. If you only have one path out then using any routing protocol is needless. That may seem like common sense, but I used to work for one large employer who, because the network admins weren't too bright about routing, used ospf on every router they had to link all their buildings. Even though each router only had a single T1 connecting it directly to the core router at the noc and that router had a direct 10/100 link to the upstream providers router. I'd tell more, but I think some people here would think I was bullshitting. Geoff Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. -----Original Message----- From: "Petter Bruland" <pbruland () fcglv com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:00:28 To:"itsec.info" <itsec.info () gmail com>,<security-basics () securityfocus com> Subject: RE: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises I guess this is a start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_network_protocols In the list of protocols, some are better suited for smaller Enterprises and others are better for bigger Enterprises. That's my 2 cents. I'm sure we'll get some better pointers from some of the more 1337 SecurityFocus members :-) -Petter -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of itsec.info Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:12 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises Hi Does anybody have an overview which shows which routing protocols are used in the Internet and which one within Enterprises only? -- Thanks very much for your help. Mike
Current thread:
- Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises itsec.info (Sep 26)
- RE: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises Bill Higgins (Sep 26)
- RE: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises Petter Bruland (Sep 26)
- Re: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises gjgowey (Sep 26)
- Re: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises Jim Mellander (Sep 27)
- Re: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises gjgowey (Sep 27)
- RE: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises Petter Bruland (Sep 27)
- RE: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises Bhardwaj, Akash (Sep 27)
- RE: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises TVB NOC (Sep 27)
- Re: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises gjgowey (Sep 26)
- Message not available
- Re: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises itsec . info (Sep 27)
- RE: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises TVB NOC (Sep 27)
- RE: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises David Gillett (Sep 27)
- R: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises Vega - Brunello Ivan (Sep 27)
- Re: R: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises gjgowey (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: Routing protocols, Internet vs Enterprises cstubbs (Sep 28)