Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: NAT external/Public IP
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:37:59 +0200
On 2007-10-25 crazy frog crazy frog wrote:
2)If you allow lots of machine to direct access the internet with external ip they may pose a security risk.How would that pose a risk that would not exist with NAT'ed machines?there are multiple machines,so it might be possible that some of them contains the vulnerable software or users are dumb enough?
At the risk of repeating myself: how would that pose a risk that would not exist with NAT'ed machines?
also hope you understand difference between having a single ip to attack and having multiple ips to attack :)
No, actually I fail to see a difference there. Please elaborate. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq
Current thread:
- RE: NAT external/Public IP, (continued)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Grant Donald (Oct 30)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 30)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Security Incidents (Oct 30)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP crazy frog crazy frog (Oct 31)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Dan Lynch (Oct 31)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Chris Barber (Oct 25)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Nick Vaernhoej (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Brett (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP crazy frog crazy frog (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 25)