Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: NAT external/Public IP
From: gavin.williams () noxs co uk
Date: 25 Oct 2007 13:39:31 -0000
There is no problem wrt using a public IP address internally, the only reason you would not use valid IP addresses internally is if you do not have sufficient public addresses, then you would use RFC1918 addrsses internally and then Nat them outbound onto a valid Public address, this also stops persons knowing what your internal network range is, as it will show as coming from your nat'd address. What do you want to use a public address internally for anyway? If it is for a web server or FTP server internally, then you can do a NAT inbound rather, to a private address.
Current thread:
- Re: NAT external/Public IP, (continued)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP crazy frog crazy frog (Oct 31)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Dan Lynch (Oct 31)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Chris Barber (Oct 25)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Nick Vaernhoej (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Brett (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP crazy frog crazy frog (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 25)
- RE: NAT external/Public IP Marc Payne (Oct 25)
- Re: NAT external/Public IP gavin . williams (Oct 25)
- Re: Re: NAT external/Public IP proneetb (Oct 25)