Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: CISSP Question


From: Florian Rommel <frommel () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 23:34:11 +0300


Touché James. Well done you pointed the one thing out that I have been
thinking about for a while as well. However in 99% I would say a person that
has been on Guard duty for 4 years won't have much interest in a CISSP and
then , if he should get it, will have to do quite some catching up to do.
Most employers will find it rather weird that he or she was doing guard duty
for 4 years and got a CISSP   :)

I do think though that this is a viable loophole for anyone that wants to
exploit it that way. I do think it is a little far fetched because you still
have to show that your job included some of the actions on the list.

Good point though, I like it. Wonder what ISC2 has to say about this and how
many people have used that or a similar loophole already.

Cheers,

//Flosse

http://blog.2blocksaway.com

On 5/2/07 10:57 PM, "Simmons, James" <jsimmons () eds com> wrote:

So here is a thought for everyone.

To qualify for CISSP, you should have at least four years of experience in one
of the ten domains. Of which includes Physical Security. So with a bit of
cramming, your gun cleaning, gate guard of 4 years can be a qualified CISSP
with next to minimal experience in Information security.
And as per the ISC2 webpage, to qualify experience you need to have done some
of the included actions.
(https://www.isc2.org/cgi-bin/content.cgi?category=1187)

Reactions anyone?

P.S. I am not saying that all gate guards are incapable of being good CISSP's.
I am just pointing out an all too common scenario.

Regards,

Simmons

-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On
Behalf Of Florian Rommel
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Nicolas villatte; krymson () gmail com; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: CISSP Question

I agree with Nicolas here. I definitely wouldn't endorse a Desktop Jockey with
4 years of experience. I already filed once a complaint because I know a guy
who, because he has some certifications and has worked as a pc support, thinks
he is qualified to take the exam. His "boss/ partner in crime" was ready to
sign off on it. I know for some people a certification like the CISSP doesn't
mean much but that still shouldn't mean anyone can get in. I had my work
experience fully documented by all my previous employers  before I took the
exam.

Security experience in any of the 10 domains for 4 years doesnt mean that
during those 4 years you should have done something security related at some
point it means that your position was directly security related.

//flosse
http://blog.2blocksaway.com


On 5/2/07 9:47 AM, "Nicolas villatte" <Nicolas.Villatte () chello be> wrote:

Not really, because 5% of your time involved in security during 4
years would give you barely 2 months of experience. I don't know any
CISSP who would endorse such a candidate.

https://www.isc2.org/cgi/content.cgi?category=1187

"Applicants must have a minimum of four years of direct full-time
security professional work experience in one or more of the ten
domains of the (ISC)² CISSP® CBK®."

Regards,
Nicolas.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
--------

Nicolas VILLATTE

CISSP, GCIA, GCIH, GCFA

Sr. Security Management Specialist


-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com
[mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of krymson () gmail com
Sent: mardi 1 mai 2007 14:14
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: CISSP Question

Just a quick add, don't overthink the 4 years' experience requirement.
You need that experience in any one (or more) of the 10 domains.
Honestly, if you're a desktop support jockey for 4 years and you do
some sort of security as part of your work (do you manage passwords
and/or respond to spyware incidents?), you can still qualify. Realistically,
anyone with 4 years'
experience in IT.






Current thread: