Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: This mailing list on a blog
From: David Nalley <davidn () keymarkinc com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:55:37 -0400
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 08:39:55 am Tara Kelly wrote:
Regardless, I think that password protecting the archives would at least put a mini (ok, *very* mini) obstacle between the mailinglist and automatic scraping/posting. But it would be better than nothing.
What makes you think they aren't subscribed to the list and scraping that way, or that they couldn't work around it. I suppose my question is, whats the point of password protecting the archives if you aren't also going to password protect the list itself. Moreover, it's all posted on Nabble as well, which gets indexed by Google, which has a far higher percentage of non-security-minded individuals. http://www.nabble.com/Security-Basics-f404.html David Nalley
Current thread:
- This mailing list on a blog tarak (May 11)
- RE: This mailing list on a blog David Harley (May 14)
- Re: This mailing list on a blog Tara Kelly (May 15)
- RE: This mailing list on a blog David Harley (May 15)
- Re: This mailing list on a blog David Nalley (May 15)
- RE: This mailing list on a blog David Harley (May 16)
- Re: This mailing list on a blog Tara Kelly (May 15)
- RE: This mailing list on a blog David Harley (May 14)
- Re: This mailing list on a blog Kim Guldberg (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: This mailing list on a blog krymson (May 14)
- re: This mailing list on a blog krymson (May 15)
- Re: This mailing list on a blog Robert Wesley McGrew (May 15)
- Re: This mailing list on a blog Stian Øvrevåge (May 16)
- Re: This mailing list on a blog Tara Kelly (May 17)
- Re: This mailing list on a blog Robert Wesley McGrew (May 15)