Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: New security Triad
From: "David Gillett" <gillettdavid () fhda edu>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 15:13:16 -0700
I haven't run across this CPP triad before. But if you're concerned that the CIA triad isn't adequate, I'd recommend the Parkerian hexad rather than some other triad. David Gillett
-----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of vijaych2779 () gmail com Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 10:04 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: New security Triad Hi everybody, I have always been under the impression that the security triad was CIA (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability) until I came across the link http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2003/0106schwartau.html . May be this is pretty late to discuss about this question as this article was posted in 2003. Nevertheless, just wanted to check with all the security folks out there if the new security TRIAD is indeed CPP (Cyber, Physical and People). Thanks Vijay
Current thread:
- RE: New security Triad David Harley (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: New security Triad Bob Hodges (May 01)
- Re: New security Triad Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (May 01)
- RE: New security Triad David Gillett (May 01)
- Re: RE: New security Triad vijay . upadhyaya (May 02)