Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS
From: Nick Owen <nickowen () mindspring com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:08:40 -0400
Excellent points Nikhil. I would only add that if you ever want to roll-out two-factor authentication you should go with radius. While we support TACACS+, many two-factor systems do not. Plus, there are a number of good, free radius servers such as Freeradius and Microsoft's IAS server. IIRC, IAS will first validate that the user is active in AD, then proxy the auth request to a 3rd party server. As for location, keep in mind that these protocols are encoded, but not encrypted. hth, Nick -- Nick Owen WiKID Systems, Inc. 404.962.8983 http://www.wikidsystems.com Commercial/Open Source Two-Factor Authentication irc.freenode.net: #wikid Nikhil Wagholikar wrote:
Hello Rlafosse, Here is a short description about differences between RADIUS & TACACS implementation: 1. Make: RADIUS is a Industry standard developed by Livingston. TACACS is CISCO proprietory. 2. Command Execution rights: RADIUS has no provision given to users as to which command that they can run on the router. TACACS has two provisions provided to user for the commands that they can run on the router: a. Based on users b. Based on groups 3. Protocol Support: RADIUS doesn't offer support to traditional protocols like ARA, X.25 PAD & NASI. TACACS provides support to multiple protocols. 4. AAA Segregation: RADIUS combines Authentication & Authorization. TACACS clearly segregates/separates Authentication, Authorization & Accounting. 5. Protocol Utilization: RADIUS works on UDP whereas TACACS works on TCP. 6. Encrption level: RADIUS only encrypts the password in the requested packet connection. TACACS encrypts the whole body of requested packet connection. So now we can clearly analyze the difference & understand that TACACS implementation is much secured as compared to RADIUS implementation. Happy AAA implementation. ---------- Nikhil Wagholikar Security Analyst NII Consulting Web: www.niiconsulting.com On 6/2/07, Lafosse, Ricardo <rlafosse () sfwmd gov> wrote:Hello all, I am considering implementing either RADIUS or TACACS+ any insight or experiences would be helpful. Also where would be the most beneficial location to place it on my infrastructure (DMZ)? Cheers, Ricardo
Current thread:
- TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Lafosse, Ricardo (Jun 01)
- Re: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Nikhil Wagholikar (Jun 04)
- Re: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Nick Owen (Jun 04)
- Re: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Alex Nedelcu (Jun 05)
- RE: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Mohamed Farid (Jun 05)
- Re: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Nikhil Wagholikar (Jun 05)
- RE: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Mohamed Farid (Jun 06)
- RE: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS elias . tamas (Jun 07)
- Re: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Nick Owen (Jun 04)
- Re: TACACS+ vs. RADIUS Nikhil Wagholikar (Jun 04)