Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: CSA vs. iPass vs. Fiberlink
From: thefifth () ameritech net
Date: 6 Mar 2006 04:04:58 -0000
We've never used CSA. We use the Nortel TunnelGuard for the end-point security compliance/remediation. Works on their SSL-VPN and IPSec VPN RAS boxes. We had iPass a few years ago and migrated last year to Fiberlink. TunnelGuard worked well with both services, and now Nortel has a "TunnelGuard like" feature for the LAN. No installation of clients/agents required (Java applet only). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE The Norwich University program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Tailor your education to your own professional goals with degree customizations including Emergency Management, Business Continuity Planning, Computer Emergency Response Teams, and Digital Investigations. http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- CSA vs. iPass vs. Fiberlink Joseph Jenkins (Mar 03)
- RE: CSA vs. iPass vs. Fiberlink Michael J. Benedetto (Mar 06)
- RE: CSA vs. iPass vs. Fiberlink Greg Owens (Mar 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CSA vs. iPass vs. Fiberlink thefifth (Mar 06)
- RE: CSA vs. iPass vs. Fiberlink Michael J. Benedetto (Mar 06)