Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: RE: True Clientless SSLVPN
From: "Wesley Ward" <wward () truenorthsolutions net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:56:10 -0400
Juniper's Secure Access is the way you want to go. You have many different options in deploying. With JSAM(Java Secure Application Manager) which doesn't require admin rights, WSAM(Windows Secure Application Manager) needs admin rights to install, or NC(Network Connect) needs admin rights to install. Or Clientless, i.e.: just the web portal, setup with web links for internal resources and file shares with no client. Much easier to configure and more granularity with custom apps that need to be utilized through the VPN. I have tested and used many of the different vendors in this space and Juniper is by far the best one, with F5's Firepass right behind Juniper. -----Original Message----- From: h0e () ihtb org [mailto:h0e () ihtb org] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:07 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Caymas has a nice solution with a small active x download for true vpn, clientless vpn is not fully compatible with stuff like RDP, not one that I have seen as of yet anyways. Caymas is the best thing thats a fairly close match to 'clientless vpn'. IMPORTANT: The information contained in this electronic message and/or its attachments is intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments without making any copies or distributions thereof. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited and may violate copyrights and/or other laws. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Current thread:
- Re: True Clientless SSLVPN, (continued)
- Re: True Clientless SSLVPN ChrisSerafin (Jun 02)
- RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Portz, Jon (Jun 01)
- RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Paul Guibord (Jun 01)
- RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Omar Salvador Alcalá Ruiz (Jun 01)
- RE: True Clientless SSLVPN tom . farrar (Jun 02)
- RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Beauford, Jason (Jun 02)
- RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Jamie Schmidt (Jun 02)
- RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Beauford, Jason (Jun 05)
- Re: RE: True Clientless SSLVPN h0e (Jun 05)
- RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Dubber, Drew B (Jun 05)
- RE: RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Wesley Ward (Jun 05)
- Re: True Clientless SSLVPN Alice Bryson (Jun 06)