Security Basics mailing list archives

FW: Is a career change to Computer Forensics fantasy or can it bereality?


From: "Craig Wright" <cwright () bdosyd com au>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:32:45 +1100


What planet are you from?

The comment "To testify as an expert you must be "certified" to do so by
the Court." Is just BS! The parties and the court accept the expert or
they counter with other "experts". This allows them to introduce
"opinion". Their testimony is weighted based on their credibility.

As an example... AU

EVIDENCE ACT 1995 - SECT 79

Exception: opinions based on specialised knowledge

If a person has specialised knowledge based on the person's training,
study or experience, the opinion rule does not apply to evidence of an
opinion of that person that is wholly or substantially based on that
knowledge.

And ... UK

"If matters arise in our law which concern other sciences or faculties,
we commonly apply for the aid of that science or faculty which it
concerns" Buckley v Rice Thomas (1554)

The expert witness is, thus, an exception to the exclusionary rule and
is permitted to give opinion evidence. In civil litigation this has
statutory authority in the UK:

"Where a person is called as a witness in any civil proceedings, his
opinion on any relevant matter on which he is qualified to give expert
evidence shall be admissible in evidence" Civil Evidence Act 1972, S.3
(1).

I can keep going on US, ECJ etc if you wish, but the fact is that there
is nothing to "certify" an expert. In Sub-juris cases you have to be
able to convince the justices of your merit. When in front of a Jury,
you need to convince them. At the same time the opposing council will
try to tear down your credibility. The duty of an expert is to the
court! Not to any party - even the one paying you. Truth first, loyalty
to the court. See the guidelines below.

And as for how an expert should behave...

http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/how/prac_direction.html

Regards,

Craig




-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com]
On Behalf Of Paula McPherson
Sent: Friday, 8 December 2006 9:24 PM
To: gillettdavid () fhda edu; reapersoft () gmail com;
security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: Is a career change to Computer Forensics fantasy or can it
bereality?



To testify as an expert you must be "certified" to do so by the Court.

Either through a voir dire of your Vitae (examination and
cross-examination

of one's professional expertise including review of all published works)
or

stipulation of parties, one way or the other the dude taking the stand
has

to be a hardware and software God.



Though I came from a legal background, I did not come to system security

late; I had to wait for them to upgrade the abacas.



-----Original Message-----

From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com]
On

Behalf Of David Gillett

Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:41 PM

To: reapersoft () gmail com; security-basics () securityfocus com

Subject: RE: Is a career change to Computer Forensics fantasy or can it
be

reality?



There has always been a conflict in my mind that one who

persues Forensics needs to first be a Security/IT type, I

have seen where this looks to be true and where it does not,

perhaps someone can comment on that.



  There are at least two common definitions of "Computer Forensics",

which *do* overlap.  Undoubtedly, some of the sources you've seen

are using one and some another.



1.  Investigation of Computer Security Incidents

  A lot of this is recognizing what's abnormal and figuring out how

it came about.  Obviously, someone without an IT background is going

to be ill-equipped for this.



2.  Recovering Evidence from Computer Systems

  This is all about being able to testify, as necessary, at termination

hearings, lawsuits, and even criminal trials, as to things like

standard procedures, sanitary methods, chain of custody, and the like.

Detailed IT knowledge is helpful, but is more essential to tool authors

than to tool users.  Although the evidence is stored in a digital

information system, the acts of which it provides evidence need not

involve any violation of computer security, but are more often evidence

of fraud, infidelity, or other sorts of non-computer malfeasance.



  Certifications come in both flavors, too.  My impression is that the

particular certs you've listed are attempting to certify expertise under

the first definition; under the second, courts have decided to accept

evidence retrieved by a few specific tools *when used by a vendor-

certified operator*, and so each tool has its vendor certification

program.

  (Jobs in the second category have so far mostly been with law
enforcement

and prosecutorial agencies, although I expect that at some point there
will

begin to be a market for these skills on the defendant side as well.)



  To those who use the second definition, activities under the first

definition are a subset of "Incident Response", and you may find it

easier to get into that general field and then specialize in the
particular

aspect that interests you, than to try to go directly into
specialization.



David Gillett







-----Original Message-----

From: listbounce () securityfocus com

[mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of

reapersoft () gmail com

Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 5:04 AM

To: security-basics () securityfocus com

Subject: Is a career change to Computer Forensics fantasy or

can it be reality?



Hello,



I am a software engineer working in the VoIP space.  I am

looking to change my career path and get into Computer Forensics.



Without any experience its going to be a tough road but I

believe my troubleshooting skills and software experience can

help.  My troubleshooting ability can be valuable on the

investigation side of things, I generally will "chew" on a

problem until its solved or at least until I have another way

to debug it and gather more information.  My programming

skills can come in handy for gathering information during an

investigation when its a network intrusion or for malware

analysis, at least this is my reasoning. 



Some things I am doing now is reading books (File System

Forensic Analysis, Real Digital Forensic etc...) and

listening to relevant podcasts but that only takes one so

far.  My other thought is to get one of the many

certifications out there so that when I attempt to gain

employment I am at least showing some initiative and not just

a passing interest in the field.  Spending some of my own

money shows a committment to my goal.



There has always been a conflict in my mind that one who

persues Forensics needs to first be a Security/IT type, I

have seen where this looks to be true and where it does not,

perhaps someone can comment on that.



I am looking for opinions on what certifications I might

spend my money on.  Should I go with a security cert, a pure

forensics cert, some combination of both or neither.



Some of the Forensic specific certs I have been evaluating

are the SANS GCFA and ISFCE CCE.



I have posted this to the SecurityFocus Forensics list but it

was rejected because it was off topic.  I did however get

some good feedback from the lists' moderator, thanks for that!

I wish to get some more feedback from others so hopefully the

Basics list is the place to post.



In a nutshell:



Can one get into the field of Computer Forensics thru self

study and getting a certification or is it such a closed

field that I should look elsewhere for a career change and

not waste my time/money?



Is the field primarily based on experience and not certs?



Any and all opinions are welcome.



Thanks in advance,



MH



--------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher



Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time.

Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats.

LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer.



http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=s

fmaildetect

--------------------------------------------------------------

-------------







------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher



Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time.

Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats.

LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer.



http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetec
t

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---





------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher



Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time.

Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats.

LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer.



http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetec
t

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---




Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation in respect of matters arising within 
those States and Territories of Australia where such legislation exists.

DISCLAIMER
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
must not use or disclose the information. If you have received this email in error, please inform us promptly by reply 
email or by telephoning +61 2 9286 5555. Please delete the email and destroy any printed copy. 

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. You may not rely on this message as advice 
unless it has been electronically signed by a Partner of BDO or it is subsequently confirmed by letter or fax signed by 
a Partner of BDO.

BDO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, 
interception, corruption or unauthorised access.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher

Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time.
Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats.
LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer.

http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetect
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: