Re: Doubt regarding Sec+

[John Maher <john.e.maher () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The material is very broad and fairly basic, but it's still valuable.
However, if you have the money and the time, I would recommend the SANS
Institute Security Essentials Bootcamp and the GSEC certification
associated with the course.  It's more detailed and more challenging.

kota_44 () yahoo com wrote:
> HI All ,
>  
> I have a question regarding Security + exam .
> I have a about an years experiance on working on Application Security and now to widen my security knowledge base and 
> also to get some relevant Security related certification under my belt
>  I had a doubt of what to start of with so the first exam which many suggested is Sec+ but a large no of others gave 
> a feed back that this one
>  aint having a good value now and not worth the Time and effort and better to start of with something like CEH .
> But other suggested this as a good base for CISSP .
>  So could you all who probably are familarized or taken Sec + can update me with pros/cons or why one should/ should 
> not take it and its current value and what can be a good alternative to start off if not Sec + . 
> Feed Back Appriciated 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDgpv8uY7WcSII22oRAjNKAJ9faI9GnHN90Tmf7CU/VSr2uDXuyQCgwkrR
mcmYFNzGTxo+66pdyuwijL0=
=0m7/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----