Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use
From: "Craig, Tobin (OIG)" <tobin.craig () va gov>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:13:09 -0400
I'm sorry, I have to chime in on this again. The opinions expressed below are my personal and professional opinions, and not the official position of my employer. Edmond, If you even suspect child pornography, according to Title 18, USC 2252, the DEFENDANT (not you, not a corporate attorney, not anyone else) has an affirmative defense to a charge if the DEFENDANT: 1 Possessed less than three images, AND 2 promptly, and in good faith, and WITHOUT RETAINING OR ALLOWING ANY PERSON OTHER THAN A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY to access any visual depiction or copy thereof: a) took reasonable steps to destroy EACH SUCH VISUAL DEPICTION, or; b) reported the matter to a law enforcement agency and afforded that agency access to each such visual depiction. So what does this mean for you? It means, under Federal Law that the affirmative defense is only available to the person who had less than three pictures, and either attempted to remove the pictures him or herself (without involving anyone else who is not a LEO), or alternatively reported them to Law Enforcement and turned them (and the media containing them) over. Unless Mr. Coombs is aware of some obscure loophole that affords him or other non law enforcement entities the luxury of getting involved in a criminal investigation, then it looks like the statute is pretty clear. Only the defendant has the affirmative defense option. Surely corporate counsel does not represent an employee as a criminal defense attorney when the employee's actions are personal and criminal. In addition, I'm unaware of any law that would allow an individual, corporation, or agency to willfully or intentionally destroy potential evidence. This is exactly the sort of thing that other much larger corporations fell for, when they shredded what turned out to be valuable evidence. As a representative of the Law Enforcement community I am outraged by the irresponsible comment: " If you report this to law enforcement, the employee WILL go to prison. Innocent or not. If the employee goes to prison and is innocent, or is even accused publicly and is innocent, and eventually finds a way to prove his innocence, your company will be sued. The employee will win the lawsuit. Your company may go out of business over its improper handling of this incident." This sort of worst case scenario scaremongering has no place in any discussion originating from a request for assistance. If you report it to law enforcement, then it will be objectively investigated. Regardless of what some may say, there are several highly qualified and experienced individuals in the law enforcement community who take pride in the standard of work they perform, and who value their objectivity. As a point of clarity, it is the US Government that prosecutes child pornography, not a corporation. If a conviction is overturned and a suit is filed, it is the US Government who would be sued, not a corporation. Edmond, I would very much hope that you will carefully evaluate the quality of all advice you have been provided in this discussion. Like Mr. Coombs, I will be glad to communicate with you further in private concerning your issue, because like Mr. Coombs, I too have considerable experience in this area of computer forensics. Just my opinion. ___________________________ Tobin Craig, MRSC, CISSP, SCERS, EnCE, CCE IT Forensic Director, Computer Crimes and Forensics Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General 801 I Street NW Washington DC 20001 Tel: 202 565 7702 Fax: 202 565 7630 ___________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Jason Coombs [mailto:jasonc () science org] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 7:14 PM To: Edmond Chow; security-basics () securityfocus com; Beauford, Jason Subject: Re: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Edmond, You cannot 'investigate' viewing of child pornographic material without violating the very same laws that you are informed may have been violated by the employee of your company who stands accused. You must stop your work immediately. Do not begin your work if you have not already, and get your company to turn the hard drive and other details over to the corporate attorney. What you must understand is that certain persons have a legal obligation to report any finding of evidence of child pornography, but that your company and its employees, in the employees' professional capacity, may not have an obligation to report to law enforcement. The company is typically allowed to simply wipe the hard drive of any computer that may have been used to view child pornography, and take whatever internal disciplinary action it deems appropriate with respect to the accused employee. Only your company's attorney can guide you properly, and you are completely wrong to want to investigate this yourself. Your company's attorney should advise you that the best thing to do is wipe the drive, and get on with the business that you are in. If you report this to law enforcement, the employee WILL go to prison. Innocent or not. If the employee goes to prison and is innocent, or is even accused publicly and is innocent, and eventually finds a way to prove his innocence, your company will be sued. The employee will win the lawsuit. Your company may go out of business over its improper handling of this incident. Please feel free to contact me directly to discuss this matter in more detail. This is an area of criminal computer forensics with which I have much experience. Sincerely, Jason Coombs jasonc () science org -----Original Message----- From: Edmond Chow <echow () videotron ca> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:27:24 To:security-basics () securityfocus com, "Beauford, Jason" <jbeauford () EightInOnePet com> Cc:Edmond Chow <echow () videotron ca> Subject: RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Good morning Jason, Thank-you to you and all who responded to me with their ideas. I am wondering if there are any reference books available that would guide me through an investigation of this sort? I am dealing with a case involving the viewing of child pornographic websites so I want to be careful to follow reference guidelines of some sort so that I don't end up in jail myself! Any help that you can provide in the form of links to articles and/or books on this subject would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Edmond -----Original Message----- From: Beauford, Jason [mailto:jbeauford () EightInOnePet com] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:50 AM To: Edmond Chow; security-basics () securityfocus com Cc: Edmond Chow Subject: RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Check out INDEXVIEW.exe. Internet explorer writes a history of all visited sites to a file labeled INDEX.DAT. This file is usually hidden. Most end users are not bright enough to research thoroughly and will not delete this file. If they use Internet Explorer as their Browser, then find this file and you will have your proof. Download INDEXVIEW here => http://superwebsearch.com/dwl/IndexView.exe Additionally, SecurityFocus has a great article which describes what you want to do: Part 1 (for IE): http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1827 Part 2 (for Firefox) http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1832 Good Luck. JMB =| -----Original Message----- =| From: Edmond Chow [mailto:echow () gettechnologies com] =| Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 7:23 PM =| To: security-basics () securityfocus com =| Cc: Edmond Chow =| Subject: RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal =| internet use =| =| =| Dear List, =| =| I'm working on the following project and would =| appreciate your views: =| =| I have been tasked with finding out if a certain =| desktop computer was used to view pornographic sites =| on the internet. This user has gone to great lengths =| to try to mask his illegal activities by erasing =| cookies, temp. =| files and by installing anti-spyware software on his =| computer. Are there any tools that would allow me to =| still uncover proof that he had accessed these sites? =| So far, the tech department is telling me that he =| did access illegal sites on only two dates but I =| suspect that this illegal activity started many =| months or years ago and it will be up to me to find =| more proof. =| =| Also, at a network level, we know his IP address but =| yet my technical support department is telling me =| that they cannot (either because they don't want to =| or because they are not technically capable of) tell =| me what internet sites this IP address has accessed =| in the past. Logically, there must be a point in the =| network (on some piece of hardware) where I can =| consult log files to track his activities? Or, is =| there a log file that I can consult that will tell me =| what sites all my users have accessed and from what =| IP address? =| =| In terms of access to the desktop in question, I will =| have full access as the computer will be in my =| possession in the coming days. =| =| Thank-you and any help that you can provide would be =| most appreciated. =| =| Regards, =| =| =| Edmond =| =| =| =| -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.17/84 - Release Date: 8/29/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.17/84 - Release Date: 8/29/2005
Current thread:
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use, (continued)
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Robinson, Sonja (Aug 30)
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Robinson, Sonja (Aug 30)
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Robinson, Sonja (Aug 30)
- Re: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Jason Coombs (Aug 30)
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use dave kleiman (Aug 31)
- Re: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Micheal Cottingham (Aug 31)
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use McKinley, Jackson (Aug 31)
- Re: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Jason Coombs (Aug 31)
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use dave kleiman (Aug 31)
- Re: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Jason Coombs (Aug 31)
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use Craig, Tobin (OIG) (Aug 31)
- Re: Re: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use jbreci (Aug 31)
- RE: Computer forensics to uncover illegal internet use dave kleiman (Aug 31)