Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Tool like HFNETCHK for windows 95


From: "Mark Koenig" <kkoenig () email arizona edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:24:22 -0700

What good would it do to make a product like HFNETCHK for Windows 95 when it
an unsupported OS by the vendor and there are no patches issued to fix any
issues that may arise. I think a vulnerability scanner would be of more use
so that you could get an idea of how to configure a software firewall for
the machine that would mitigate the vulnerabilities.

Mark Koenig
Support Systems Analyst, Principal
CCIT User Support Rm. 312
University of Arizona
kkoenig () email arizona edu
520-621-6715

-----Original Message-----
From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtrent () yahoo com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:18 PM
To: 'Karthik Rajkumar'; security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: Tool like HFNETCHK for windows 95


Since this is a security list, its probably best to note that 
Windows 95 isn't a secure operating system and never will be. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Karthik Rajkumar [mailto:karthik_rajkumar () sify com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:16 PM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Tool like HFNETCHK for windows 95

Hi Friends,

  Can you pls suggest any tools like "HFNETCHK"
for windows 95 and also pls let me know is there any 
possibility to run "hfnetchk" in windows 95

Rgds.
Karthik

-------------------------------------------------
Click here to find your dream partner!
Know more at http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/partner/sify.html

Sify Power mail- a Premium Service from Sify Mail!
know more at http://mail.sify.com

--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------


--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: