Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: source LAN port 137 dest 169.x


From: "James Fields" <jvfields () tds net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:20:18 -0400

If you could give the *actual* destination address, I could be certain, but
it's probably the following.

On Microsoft boxes which are configured to use DHCP for their network
settings, *if* they broadcast for DHCP and fail to get the settings, they
will "self-assign" an address.  I believe the addresses used start with 169,
and I believe if you use Sam Spade or some other tool to do an IP Block
lookup you'll see a little more information about it.

So why is it showing up as a destination?  Once a Windows box comes up with
such a bogus address, this still does not mean it is "dead" on the network.
It dutifully goes about doing what Windows boxes do, which is a lot of
NetBIOS broadcasting.  The packets you see are probably boxes on your local
network trying to respond to those broadcasts which were originally sourced
from the 169 guy.

Since you obviously don't use that actual network, your default routing in
your network is likely carrying those responses out toward your Internet
perimeter, and getting dropped at your firewall.

And no, assuming I am right, I am not particularly wise about this - I've
had the same experience and a lot of time to track it down :-)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Gragg" <admin () bsbks com>
To: <security-basics () securityfocus com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: source LAN port 137 dest 169.x


I am seeing some UDP packets showing up in my logs as being dropped that
have a source of 172 my local subnet with a port of 137 and a destination of
a 169.xxx.xxx.xxx address with a port of 137.  what would that destination
be telling me?  Any ideas?  Thanks very much in advance

Darren Gragg
Network Administrator


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: