Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: nmap status question
From: Joshua J.Kugler <isd () as uaf edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:28:45 -0800
Marc -
From the nmap man page:
"The result of running nmap is usually a list of interesting ports on them achine(s) being scanned (if any). Nmap always gives the port's "well known" service name (if any), number, state, and protocol. The state is either 'open', ´filtered´, or ´unfiltered´. Open means that the target machine will accept() connections on that port. Filtered means that a firewall, filter, or other network obstacle is covering the port and preventing nmap from determining whether the port is open. Unfiltered means that the port is known by nmap to be closed and no firewall/filter seems to be interfering with nmap's attempts to determine this. Unfiltered ports are the common case and are only shown when most of the scanned ports are in the filtered state." Bascially, what "filtered" means is that the machine, or a firewall, is simply dropping the packets trying to connect to that port, as opposed to sending back a "connection refused" message, which would indicate a close port Hope that helps. j----- k------ On Monday 28 July 2003 10:03, marc brown wrote:
i am new to linux but after getting my rh9 box running i have started to use nmap to do some scanning of my networks. can someone tell me exactly what it means when the state of a particular port is 'filtered'? thanks, marc
-- Joshua Kugler, Information Services Director Associated Students of the University of Alaska Fairbanks isd () asuaf org, 907-474-7601 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- nmap status question marc brown (Jul 28)
- RE: nmap status question Thomas Ng (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Joshua J . Kugler (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question David (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question gminick (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Pete Hunt (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Birl (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Terry A. Durrant (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Shaun Moore (Jul 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: nmap status question john mathew (Jul 29)
- RE: nmap status question Brad Bemis (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question David Vertie (Jul 29)