Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Best for of signature
From: "Meritt James" <meritt_james () bah com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:14:00 -0500
Concur. I distrust them to the extent that I never see them. Hence, the vote for inline. Jim Chris Berry wrote:
From: Frank Barton <pauling () starwolf biz> I was wondering what people's feelings are here as to the best way to digitally sign a message. mutt for example creates the digital signature as an attachment, and then attaches it, while some people create the signature as part of the text of the message. Which way is best? or most compatable?I personally distrust any attachments I didn't specifically request, so my vote would be for inline signatures. Chris Berry compjma () hotmail com Systems Administrator JM Associates "For Sys Admins paranoia isn't a mental health problem, its a marketable job skill." _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
-- James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA Booz | Allen | Hamilton phone: (410) 684-6566
Current thread:
- Best for of signature Frank Barton (Feb 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Best for of signature Chris Berry (Feb 10)
- Re: Best for of signature Meritt James (Feb 12)
- RE: Best for of signature Alejandro Criado-Pérez (Feb 13)
- Re: Best for of signature Meritt James (Feb 12)
- RE: Best for of signature Alejandro Criado-Pérez (Feb 14)
- RE: Best for of signature Mike Jensen (Feb 14)