Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: RTP player - a suggestion
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:53:30 -0800
On Nov 6, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Peter Budny via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> wrote:
I have plenty of captures handy, but it would probably be best if I record some new ones to illustrate the problems more clearly. I could also write up a “steps to reproduce” showing how I would normally do things in the v1 GUI, and how the v2 GUI makes it harder or impossible to do the same thing. Should I just reply with the files attached (and zipped?), or is there a better way to submit captures?
If you have a problem with the RTP player, the best way to submit captures for them is to either 1) submit a new bug and attach the captures to the bug (don't bother zipping, just attach the captures directly as separate files, so we don't have to *un*zip them) or 2) if there's already a bug for the problem, add more information to that bug as necessary and attach the captures to that bug. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: RTP player - a suggestion Roland Knall (Nov 06)
- Re: RTP player - a suggestion Peter Budny via Wireshark-dev (Nov 06)
- Re: RTP player - a suggestion Guy Harris (Nov 06)
- Re: RTP player - a suggestion Roland Knall (Nov 06)
- Re: RTP player - a suggestion Erik de Jong (Nov 13)
- Re: RTP player - a suggestion Guy Harris (Nov 06)
- Re: RTP player - a suggestion Peter Budny via Wireshark-dev (Nov 06)