Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: checklicenses.py
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:15:07 -0700
On Aug 8, 2016, at 3:10 PM, João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt> wrote:
Mainly what I was trying to say is that this dual licensing distinction can already be handled with path-specific exceptions so I guess I'm indifferent to adding more code for this.
I view path-specific exceptions as workarounds for deficiencies in licensecheck, and would prefer to have as few path-specific exceptions as possible. Ideally, the only places where path-specific exceptions would be used would be places where licensecheck would need AI rather than pattern matching to identify the license. :-) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: checklicenses.py, (continued)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 05)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 05)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py Michael Mann (Aug 06)