Re: checklicenses.py

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Aug 8, 2016, at 9:00 AM, João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt> wrote:

> > Is there some reason not to treat "you can license this under the BSD license or under the GPL" as an acceptable 
> > license?
>
> Please review https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/16957/.

That's still special-casing the dual-licensed files; any reason not to just treat it as an acceptable license by adding 
"BSD (3 clause) GPL (v2)" to WHITELISTED_LICENSES?

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe