Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Undissected packet bytes
From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:23:55 +0100
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Michal Labedzki <michal.labedzki () tieto com> wrote:
One more hint: if push patch as draft then add reviewer, because draft is invisible for anyone (expect author and reviewers) Alternative command(s) to send to gerrit: git push origin HEAD:refs/drafts/master git push origin HEAD:refs/publish/master
Thanks for the suggestion, I missed that.
By the way: I vote for adding expert info. Sometimes there are undecoded fields with info like that "Undecoded if you want that ask developers to add" :)
That was my idea, too. But I encountered some issues achieving that. I will add you as reviewer too, maybe you can suggest me a feasible way to to that. Anyone interested, please ask to be added.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Undissected packet bytes, (continued)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Michal Labedzki (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 06)