Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Undissected packet bytes
From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:22:23 +0100
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
As a side note, I would expect that method to be *very* slow, since it traverses the entire tree for every byte of the packet. Traversing the tree once and maintaining a set of covered/uncovered ranges would be much more efficient.
I can't figure out how to traverse the tree once.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 03)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 03)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Alexis La Goutte (Feb 03)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Michal Labedzki (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Alexis La Goutte (Feb 03)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Michal Labedzki (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 06)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 03)