Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark
From: Stephen Fisher <sfisher () SDF ORG>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 12:26:44 -0700
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:23:03PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
One major issue would be implementing things like the packet list. We currently extend the GtkTreeView/GtkTreeModel in GTK and at quick glance it appears that we extend QTreeView/QAbstractItemModel in a similar fashion for Qt. We would need to create our own model/view/controller code and then just display the view using GTK/QT/curses/etc routines.
On a similar note: GLib has many non-GUI features that we use and Qt provides similar functionality. Are we going to move everything to Qt's way of doing things, or keep Glib around even if we don't use GTK or roll our own utility functions/variable types/etc. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Stephen Fisher (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Stephen Fisher (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Guy Harris (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Stephen Fisher (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Guy Harris (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Guy Harris (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Stephen Fisher (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Guy Harris (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Stephen Fisher (Nov 28)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Bálint Réczey (Nov 29)
- Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark Edwin Groothuis (Nov 29)