Re: -commits emails

[mmann78 () netscape net]

On a related note, it seems like Gerrit encourages more comments within its interface when discussing a bug/enhancement 
then doing it Bugzilla (where all outside patches used to go through).  It was (is) always nice to have a "masochist" 
(-bugs subscriber) interject something into a bug in Bugzilla they weren't necessarily "following".   Does Gerrit 
create the need for yet another "list" to follow to get the same information?


-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
To: alexis.lagoutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>; Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark 
org>
Sent: Mon, Feb 10, 2014 2:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] -commits emails


On 2/10/14 10:41 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
>     And as of this morning (or perhaps slightly earlier) I've stopped
>     receiving them at all...?
>
> Yes, i confirm too...

They've been mis-sent since Thursday. (It might help if the script were
running in production mode instead of test mode.) There are 21 missing
commits. I'll fix the script and resend the messages shortly.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

 

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe