Re: Git+gerrit status update - 2014-01-14

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>]

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:01:55PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
> It sets up so that "git review" does the correct push, as well as
> setting the gerrit topic to the current branch name (if different from
> "master") and a few other conveniences. So there's no particular
> reason to set up git push. This lets admins differentiate between push
> (which force-pushes to master for admin purposes) and review (which
> goes to gerrit).

Ah, now I understand! So now that I have managed to get my first three
commits into review, how do I proceed on the command line?
The reason I need to ask is that intro-quick only explains the workflow
via web browser - which is something that I'm not intending to use.
If I understand things correctly I should be able to do the same thing
using "git review", or am I wrong here somehow?

Thanks
   Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe