Wireshark mailing list archives
To display reserved fields or not display reserved fields, that is the question...
From: Kaul <mykaul () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 17:53:39 +0200
Should I: proto_tree_add_text(seg_param_tree, tvb, offset, 2, "reserved"); offset += 2; or: offset += 2; /* reserved */ What is better? (Regretully I'm working on SCSI, whose creators LOVED sprinkling reserved bytes everywhere!). Do we have a standard? (perhaps worth having a global param for it?!). Y.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- To display reserved fields or not display reserved fields, that is the question... Kaul (Dec 08)
- Re: To display reserved fields or not display reserved fields, that is the question... mmann78 (Dec 08)
- Re: To display reserved fields or not display reserved fields, that is the question... Edwin Groothuis (Dec 08)