Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!]
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:04:56 -0700
On Oct 17, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl> wrote:
I want to use similar approach as I've done with edited frames - binary tree with frane number as key.
That's the approach I was thinking would be right as well. (BTW, you might want to hook the frame-editing stuff to the same "file has unsaved changes" etc. stuff that the comment-editing code uses, if that hasn't been done already.)
Anyway we first need to fix wiretap readers, mainly pcap-ng.
I may have an in-progress project that could take care of some of that; I'll look at that (once I'm finished tweaking the AS/400^WiSeries^WIBM i packet dump reader to fix some bugs I noticed when doing some regression tests). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 07)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 17)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Guy Harris (Oct 17)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 17)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Guy Harris (Oct 17)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 17)