Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!]
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:15:44 -0700
On Oct 7, 2012, at 2:06 PM, Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl> wrote:
Big plan is to remove two members from frame_data structure: interface_id and opt_comment reducing size of frame_data structure from 128B to 112B (on 64bits).
Note that comments aren't stored solely in the file - the user might add, change, or remove comments, and not have saved the edited file yet - *but* 99 44/100% of packets probably *haven't* had their comment sets edited, so a separate data structure with entries only for those packets that *have* had their comment sets edited would probably suffice. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 07)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 17)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Guy Harris (Oct 17)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 17)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Guy Harris (Oct 17)
- Re: Use wtap_pkthdr instead of wtap_pseudo_header [ABI breakage!] Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 17)