Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tshark vs dumpcap
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:13:58 -0700
On Oct 30, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Marco Zuppone wrote:
The official WireShark study guide states that dumpcap consumes less memory..
...because it doesn't dissect packets and keep any persistent data needed to do that. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- tshark vs dumpcap Stuart Kendrick (Oct 30)
- tshark display filter / time Stuart Kendrick (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark display filter / time j.snelders (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Shawn T Carroll (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Marco Zuppone (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Guy Harris (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Jim Aragon (Oct 30)
- tshark display filter / time Stuart Kendrick (Oct 30)