Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tshark vs dumpcap
From: Marco Zuppone <msz () msz it>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:02:49 +0000
The official WireShark study guide states that dumpcap consumes less memory.. --StockTrader - Marco. On 30 Oct 2011, at 13:23, Stuart Kendrick wrote:
Is there any performance advantage to using dumpcap over tshark, for pure packet capture? [Less chance of dropping frames perhaps?] --sk Stuart Kendrick FHCRC ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- tshark vs dumpcap Stuart Kendrick (Oct 30)
- tshark display filter / time Stuart Kendrick (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark display filter / time j.snelders (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Shawn T Carroll (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Marco Zuppone (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Guy Harris (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Jim Aragon (Oct 30)
- tshark display filter / time Stuart Kendrick (Oct 30)