Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem
From: Risto Paasila <risto () longpoint org au>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 12:59:44 +1000
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problemDid I miss something? a arbitrary long field of binary data can not be FT_STRING. /AndersThe field that I initially had in question was: correlationID [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING (SIZE(14)) So it should be maximum 14 octets. Is that still arbitrary?No, as the octet string has size constraints but still the hf field constructed for an OCTET STRING Should be FT_BYTES as its Binary data, if a implementation chooses to put a string in that field you Can override that by defining a .#ATTRIB (I think) but be aware that some other manufacturer/protocol implementer my put binary data in there and then the dissection would be wrong. Unless it's specified that even though the Asn1 spec is OCTET STRING a utf8 string should be put in that field. Regards Anders
You have given hope :-) This is from my conformance file, but as I originally said, those are taken and displayed in the debug output, so I am wondering why it doesn't put them into the generated HF code: #.TYPE_ATTR operationCode TYPE = FT_INT32 DISPLAY = BASE_DEC STRINGS = VALS(myOperationNames) errorCode TYPE = FT_INT32 DISPLAY = BASE_DEC STRINGS = VALS(errorCodeNames) correlationID TYPE = FT_STRING DISPLAY = BASE_NONE uIScriptSpecificInformation TYPE = FT_STRING DISPLAY = BASE_NONE uIScriptResult TYPE = FT_STRING DISPLAY = BASE_NONE OCTET_STRING_SIZE_14 TYPE = FT_STRING DISPLAY = BASE_NONE #.END Regards Risto ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 02)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Anders Broman (May 02)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 02)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Anders Broman (May 03)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 03)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Anders Broman (May 03)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 04)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 04)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 02)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Anders Broman (May 02)