Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem
From: Risto Paasila <risto () longpoint org au>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 21:22:54 +1000
Did I miss something? a arbitrary long field of binary data can not be FT_STRING. /Anders
The field that I initially had in question was: correlationID [0] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING (SIZE(14)) So it should be maximum 14 octets. Is that still arbitrary? Thanks Risto. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 02)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Anders Broman (May 02)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 02)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Anders Broman (May 03)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 03)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Anders Broman (May 03)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 04)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 04)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Risto Paasila (May 02)
- Re: asn2wrs conformance TYPE_ATTR problem Anders Broman (May 02)