Re: New openSAFETY dissector

[Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>]

Unfortunatly there is no telling when it will be reviewed though - someone will have to find the time to do it. 

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Roland Knall
Sent: den 18 mars 2011 14:57
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New openSAFETY dissector

Thank you, knew I was missing something

regards, Roland


2011/3/18 Stig Bjørlykke <stig () bjorlykke org>:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:
> > Could someone please tell me, if sending a new dissector in as bug, 
> > is the accepted method of adding a new dissector?
>
> Yes.  But you have to set review_for_checkin on the attached patch.
>
>
> --
> Stig Bjørlykke
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _____ Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list 
> <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe