Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: New openSAFETY dissector
From: Stig Bjørlykke <stig () bjorlykke org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:41:12 +0100
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:
Could someone please tell me, if sending a new dissector in as bug, is the accepted method of adding a new dissector?
Yes. But you have to set review_for_checkin on the attached patch. -- Stig Bjørlykke ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 14)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Stig Bjørlykke (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Anders Broman (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Guy Harris (Mar 19)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 22)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 24)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Stig Bjørlykke (Mar 18)
- Re: New openSAFETY dissector Roland Knall (Mar 18)