Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tcpdump
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:22:17 -0700
On Jun 21, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Andrew Hood wrote:
Guy Harris wrote:On Jun 19, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Guy Harris wrote:isn't working, because the feedback it depends on (the Fragmentation Required messages) aren't getting through to the sender."...*isn't* getting through to the router". (It needs to agree with "feedback", not with "messages" in the parenthetical note.)Sender was right. It is up to the sender to frag packets (by retransmitting with a smaller MTU) if they were sent with DF set.
Actually, what I wanted to say there was "...*isn't* getting through to the sender"; I was fixing the singular/plural agreement of "feedback it depends on" and "isn't getting through", I wasn't intending to change "sender" to "router". ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: tcpdump, (continued)
- Re: tcpdump Jaap Keuter (Jun 17)
- Re: tcpdump Kaushal Shriyan (Jun 17)
- Re: tcpdump Jaap Keuter (Jun 18)
- Re: tcpdump Guy Harris (Jun 18)
- Re: tcpdump Kaushal Shriyan (Jun 18)
- Re: tcpdump Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: tcpdump Andrew Hood (Jun 19)
- Re: tcpdump Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: tcpdump Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: tcpdump Andrew Hood (Jun 21)
- Re: tcpdump Guy Harris (Jun 21)
- Re: tcpdump Kaushal Shriyan (Jun 17)
- Re: tcpdump Jaap Keuter (Jun 17)