Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement
From: "Dom De Vitto" <dom () DeVitto com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:11:40 +0100
From a Peekabooty standpoint you get all your information from
your direct peers, of course they are very likely to be proxying the data from another peer (etc, etc). I believe that a number of peekabooty "starting hosts" are setup, but just like gnutella, these are just arbitary start points, so shutting them down would just mean another was advertised elsewhere. So no "service" would exist, I'd hope. Dom |-----Original Message----- |From: Golden_Eternity [mailto:bhodi_jabir () yahoo com] |Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:25 PM |To: Dom De Vitto; vuln-dev () securityfocus com |Subject: RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement | | |I'm waiting for anonymizer/peekabooty incorporation into a |p2p network. | |If the goal of the network is universal access to the files, |then the DMCA goons are gonna be able to get at the files. |And if the connections are direct to the system hosting the |contraband, then you have the situation we're talking about |right now. But if the route were somehow obfuscated, then no |one would really know what system was actually sharing the files out. | |Of course, then the MPAA/RIAA/etc might go after the P2P |service if one exists (a la napster) or they might be able to |go after you as being a party to the violation even though |you don't host the file yourself, just act as a node on the network... | |But it could be interesting. | |-G_E | |> A better system would be to distrubute (over many hosts) |pieces which |> are not recognisable individually (e.g. bit0.bin, bit1, |> ...bit8.bin) and then distribute a recombination system. |> That would mean that you individually would have |"0101010100", which |> they would have to prove was part of whatever.mpg.... ...difficult, |> and harder to prove that _you_knew_ that's what it was! | | | |
Current thread:
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement, (continued)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement wozz (Jul 11)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Altheide, Cory (Jul 11)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Vinnie Lima (Jul 11)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Steven J. Sobol (Jul 13)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement lists@polerecky (Jul 14)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Steven J. Sobol (Jul 13)
- Re: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Thomas Akin (Jul 12)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement BRAD GRIFFIN (Jul 12)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Dom De Vitto (Jul 12)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Golden_Eternity (Jul 12)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Bryan Klingner (Jul 12)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Dom De Vitto (Jul 13)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Golden_Eternity (Jul 12)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement dev-null (Jul 12)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Vachon, Scott (Jul 12)
- FW: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Everhart, Glenn (FUSA) (Jul 12)
- RE: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement Keith Tyler (Jul 12)