Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so
From: Olaf Kirch <okir () caldera de>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:27:53 +0200
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:43:32AM +0300, Sabau Daniel wrote:
boxes and i've been succesfull, please if anyone know how to eliminate this hole in my security give me a replay. If i try to change the mode on
You can't fix it. You can always do cp file-with-mode-444-perms ./foobar chmod +x foobar ./foobar Unix file permission bits aren't really orthogonal, especially r and x. Even though it may give some admins a deep feeling of satisfaction, playing with the r and x bits accomplishes nothing in terms of security. Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | Anyone who has had to work with X.509 has probably okir () caldera de | experienced what can best be described as ------------------+ ISO water torture. -- Peter Gutmann
Current thread:
- /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Sabau Daniel (Apr 22)
- RE: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Tech Support (Apr 24)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Marlon Jabbur (Apr 24)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Eric Rostetter (Apr 24)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Olaf Kirch (Apr 24)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Bill Weiss (Apr 24)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Kurt Seifried (Apr 25)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Robert A. Seace (Apr 25)
- nobody suid shell (kind of relationship with the ld-2.2.4 thread...) Anibal Ambertin (Apr 26)
- Re: nobody suid shell (kind of relationship with the ld-2.2.4 thread...) c0n (Apr 26)
- Re: nobody suid shell (kind of relationship with the ld-2.2.4 thread...) Bill Weiss (Apr 26)
- Re: nobody suid shell (kind of relationship with the ld-2.2.4 thread...) Jim Nanney (Apr 26)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Bill Weiss (Apr 24)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Florian Weimer (Apr 26)
- RE: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Tech Support (Apr 24)
- Re: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so FozZy (Apr 24)
- RE: /lib/ld-2.2.4.so Tech Support (Apr 25)