Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
RE: Software authentication (was RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP))
From: "Dom De Vitto" <dom () devitto com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 01:11:20 +0100
| I'd agree that it's possible to make it too much of a pain in the ass, though |:) You've just hit the nail on the head, that's what security professionals do every day. (or at least _try_ and do) And anyone (Bill, not you) who uses words like "nearly impossible" hasn't been in security long.... :-( Dom
Current thread:
- Gibson (was Crack Office XP) Fenris (Jun 11)
- RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP) David Schwartz (Jun 11)
- RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP) Ric Messier (Jun 12)
- Re: Gibson (was Crack Office XP) ian (Jun 13)
- RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP) Ric Messier (Jun 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP) Kayne Ian (Softlab) (Jun 11)
- Software authentication (was RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP)) jts28 (Jun 13)
- Re: Software authentication (was RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP)) Mark Collins (Jun 14)
- Re[2]: Software authentication (was RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP)) dullien (Jun 15)
- Re: Software authentication (was RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP)) J Edgar Hoover (Jun 15)
- Re: Software authentication (was RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP)) bill_weiss (Jun 15)
- RE: Software authentication (was RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP)) Dom De Vitto (Jun 17)
- Software authentication (was RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP)) jts28 (Jun 13)
- RE: Gibson (was Crack Office XP) David Schwartz (Jun 11)