Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: WSCRIPT.EXE , CSCRIPT.EXE replacement for *.vbs

From: BlueBoar () THIEVCO COM (Blue Boar)
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 21:14:38 -0700


Richard Rager wrote:


  I have users that are not willing to remove their wscript and cscript
links.  :-(


It would be pretty to change iluvyu0 to 3y30wnj00, which disables or
modifies wscript and cscript.  Exactly the set of users who fall for this
type of thing will automatically patch themselves.

                                        BB

Current thread:

Sendmail vs *.vbs Todd Garrison (May 07)
- Re: Sendmail vs *.vbs Mariusz Woloszyn (May 08)
  - WSCRIPT.EXE , CSCRIPT.EXE replacement for *.vbs Richard Rager (May 11)
    - Re: WSCRIPT.EXE , CSCRIPT.EXE replacement for *.vbs Blue Boar (May 11)
    - Re: WSCRIPT.EXE , CSCRIPT.EXE replacement for *.vbs Daniel S. Otis-Vigil (May 11)
    - Re: WSCRIPT.EXE , CSCRIPT.EXE replacement for *.vbs Richard Rager (May 12)
- Re: Sendmail vs *.vbs Sean A. Walberg (May 08)
- Re: Sendmail vs *.vbs Gert-Jan Hagenaars (May 08)
  - Re: Sendmail vs *.vbs Sean A. Walberg (May 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sendmail vs *.vbs Mark Tinberg (May 08)
- Re: Sendmail vs *.vbs Mariusz Woloszyn (May 08)