Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: distributed.net and seti@home
From: hypnos () M-NET ARBORNET ORG (hypnos)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 21:29:05 +0000
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Shashi Dookhee wrote:
Doesnt Seti@home and rc5/etc use IP addresses, and not hostnames? That would make changing the DNS recordz futile, as they wouldnt need to resolve anything ;)
Someone else pointed out that SETI uses names, and rc5 does also. I jsut deleted the rc5 client because it couldn't resolve "us.v27.distributed.net", even though I did an nslookup on it, and my networks DNS server had it in it's cache... Oh well... ------------------------------------------------------ hypnos <mailto:hypnos () m-net arbornet org>
Current thread:
- distributed.net and seti@home Seth R Arnold (Jan 28)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Justin Lintz (Jan 28)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home CyberPsychotic (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Robert Wojciechowski Jr. (Jan 28)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Seth R Arnold (Jan 29)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Robert Wojciechowski Jr. (Jan 29)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Blue Boar (Jan 30)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Shashi Dookhee (Jan 30)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Matthew Pemble (Jan 30)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home hypnos (Jan 30)
- Oracle liberal world (Jan 30)
- Re: distributed.net and seti@home Bryce Walter (Jan 30)