Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Napster a little insecure?
From: whitevampire () MINDLESS COM (WHiTe VaMPiRe)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:18:26 -0500
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 03:52:20PM +0100, Thomas Maschutznig wrote: : There _IS_ some kind of check, which files are being sent.. : I've heard of three actually : (dont take this as 100% sure.. PLEASE) Perhaps this is a little excessive, as this thread is start to reiterate, but Jordan already said that Napster checked for the MPEG headers in every file beginning the transfer. Regards, -- __ ______ ____ / \ / \ \ / / WHiTe VaMPiRe\Rem \ \/\/ /\ Y / whitevampire () mindless com \ / \ / http://www.gammaforce.org/ \__/\ / \___/ http://www.projectgamma.com/ \/ "Silly hacker, root is for administrators." <HR NOSHADE> <UL> <LI>application/pgp-signature attachment: stored </UL>
Current thread:
- Napster a little insecure? Dennis Miller (Jan 27)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Gunes Sen (Jan 27)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Jordan Ritter (Jan 28)
- IIS4.0 .htw vulnerability Fricke, Gregory D. (Jan 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Thiago Mello (Jan 28)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Sebastian (Jan 29)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? technot (Jan 29)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Thomas Maschutznig (Jan 29)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Mark Shirley (Jan 30)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? WHiTe VaMPiRe (Jan 30)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Jordan Ritter (Jan 30)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Maniac . (Jan 30)